Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  22 / 50 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 50 Next Page
Page Background

A D V A N C E D M A T E R I A L S & P R O C E S S E S | A P R I L 2 0 1 7

2 2

T

he number of materials engineers

is not expected to significantly

grow in the future, but their influ-

ence on the way materials are selected,

used, sourced, and manufactured in a

company will undergo a structural shift

with considerable business impact. Fur-

ther, the scope of materials engineering

leadership will broaden from component

and subsystem level work to influence

on product, strategy, and business goals.

This evolution together with technology

megatrends such as materials analytics,

modeling, optimization, and Industry

4.0 (IoT) will significantly transform the

conventional view of the materials engi-

neering function as a quality sub-func-

tion—with emphasis on experience and

experiments.

CURRENT STATE

Direct material cost is the highest

cost item for an original equipment

manufacturer (OEM) of automotive, ag-

ricultural, and construction equipment.

Four significant OEM materials deci-

sions include:

1. Materials research (introduction of

new materials or process)

2. Materials selection for a component

or assembly

3. Materials processing

4. Materials sourcing

LEADERSHIP ROLES FOR

MATERIALS ENGINEERS

STEADILY EVOLVING:

ARE YOU READY?

Today’s materials engineering leadership role is expected to expand and have a

greater impact on evolving the organizational, technological, and strategic initiatives

of original equipment manufacturers.

Satyam S. Sahay, FASM,* John Deere Technology Center India, Pune

*Member of ASM International

However, only one of these deci-

sions is driven by materials engineering

in OEMs (Table 1). Unfortunately, the

role of materials engineering is reac-

tionary in many of these decisions, i.e.,

fixing wrong materials decisions made

by other functions. Even the introduc-

tion of new materials or processes,

which is typically performed by mate-

rials engineering, requires synergy and

maturity of design, supply manage-

ment, manufacturing, and quality func-

tions for transitioning to business.

Traditionally, the OEM materials

engineering function has 4E charac-

teristics: (1) expertise and experience

based decisions, (2) experiment based

decisions, (3) emergency problem

solving, and (4) external supplier de-

pendency. Most materials engineering

decisions are derived from functional

experience plus laboratory and shop-

floor experiments. Materials engineers

are continually “putting out fires” on

product issues in the field or at the

customer (failure analysis) and on the

manufacturing line due to this reac-

tionary approach. Many of these issues

are attributed to decisions made at an

earlier stage of design, manufacturing,

and procurement without appropri-

ate materials engineering input. With

today’s increased emphasis on out-

sourcing, there is greater dependence

on external suppliers for many key

materials processes and workflow de-

cisions, resulting in a loss of important

OEM competencies and skillsets. Fur-

ther, materials engineering functions

operate primarily at the component or

subsystem level, resulting in limited in-

fluence and impact.

IMMENSE POSSIBILITIES AND

BUSINESS IMPACT

New skillsets and an encouraging

environment provide anunprecedented

opportunity for materials engineering

CAREERS INMATERIALS ENGINEERING

TABLE 1 — KEY OEM MATERIALS DECISIONS AND RESPONSIBLE FUNCTIONS

Key materials engineering decisions

Function driving decision

Materials research

Materials engineering

Materials selection

Design function

Materials processing

Manufacturing engineering

Materials sourcing

Supply management function