Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  24 / 50 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 50 Next Page
Page Background

A D V A N C E D M A T E R I A L S & P R O C E S S E S | A P R I L 2 0 1 7

2 4

to generate insight for process optimi-

zation and control. This work results

in tangible business value in terms of

enhanced operational productivity,

proactive furnace maintenance, recipe

rationalization, and operational cost

reduction.

Further, the emergence of Indus-

try 4.0 can have a significant impact on

materials processing operations such

as heat treatment

[8]

and foundry oper-

ations. The most significant difference

would be a mindset change in consid-

ering the heat treating process as part

of the connected production operation

instead of the prevalent silo view. A con-

nected gearmaking process is illustrat-

ed in Fig. 7.

Heat treating data, which is typ-

ically used for quality audit purposes,

would be leveraged to provide part-lev-

el data-sharing for improved pre- or

post- operations. Transferring specific

data (e.g., chemistry data from the steel

mill and casting) could provide better

control of reheating, annealing, and

carburizing operations, which in turn

would help mitigate or manage distor-

tion in these precision components.

Also, identifying the location of specific

components in batch type operations

would help to design better recipes for

machining and finishing operations.

Such individualized solutions at the

part level would bring transformational

change to quality control at the product

level. One of the biggest changes in the

heat treating operation is recipe man-

agement, which is now heuristically

driven. The large amount of production

and quality data and their mathemat-

ical models would help in developing

self-learning and self-evolving heat

treating recipes, suiting current produc-

tion and quality needs with due consid-

eration of current furnace health and

operating conditions. When aligned

with the overall Industry 4.0 vision,

these changes would also make heat

treating operationally efficient with ro-

bust quality products.

Supply management

. Materials en-

gineering could play a significant role by

providing strategic input to the materi-

als-sourcing and supply-management

(Fig. 5). Considering the improvement in

fatigue life due to residual compressive

stress, this active feedback approach in

the design phase could result in weight

reduction of 12% for a carburized shaft

and 5-8% for a shot peened shaft

[4]

. An-

other example of product impact is the

development of a sugarcane harvester

from system level modeling of wear

mechanisms, understanding of a ma-

terials wear map, and machine-crop

interactions

[5]

. This industry-leading

innovation is expected to significantly

reduce wear on the harvester cutting

blades—the second highest operating

expense after fuel costs

[6]

.

Other possible impacts of product

engineering include rationalizing mate-

rials grades and thicknesses and devel-

oping specific ground level application

maps for materials, processes, and

treatments. These solutions must be

deployed appropriately in the product

development cycle, PLM tool sets, stan-

dards, and designer guidelines so that

manufacturing can be systematically

scaled up to create significant value.

Manufacturing operations

. A signif-

icant amount of material, process, pro-

duction, and quality data is generated

in modern manufacturing operations,

which are primarily used for process

audits and troubleshooting specific

batches with quality issues. These rich

data sets can be better used to gener-

ate insights for process optimization to

improve manufacturing efficiency and

product quality for overall reduction in

operating costs (Fig. 6).

Big data, data analytics, and da-

ta-based modeling approaches (neural

network, principal component anal-

ysis, and other advanced statistical

methods) are emerging to analyze

manufacturing operations. The effec-

tiveness of this approach is described

in the literature

[7]

, where manufactur-

ing data together with domain under-

standing are synthesized with physics

and data-based modeling approaches

Fig. 4 —

Production part for a tractor

developed through design optimization and

rational materials selection.

Fig. 5 —

Active feedback loop for anticipat-

ing and incorporating manufacturing-in-

duced changes in the design process for

robust, optimal products

[4]

.

Fig. 6 —

Approach to process analytics, integratedmodeling (data and physics based), and opti-

mization for industrial processes

[7]

.