Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  28 / 50 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 50 Next Page
Page Background

A D V A N C E D M A T E R I A L S & P R O C E S S E S | A P R I L 2 0 1 7

2 8

a strong resistance to biocides and anti-

biotics that would otherwise easily kill

them. Despite the many problems at-

tributed to biofilms, there are instances

Fig. 4

– Bacteria drawn to organic compounds on material surfaces produce biofilms by excret-

ing polysaccharides when present in sufficient numbe s.

TABLE 2 – ASTM STANDARDS RELATED TO BIOFILMS

Standards

Purposes

Sources

E2562

Biofilm formation and quantification (continuous flow reactors)

www.astm.org/Standards/E2562.htm

E2871

Evaluating disinfectant efficacy (single tube method)

www.astm.org/Standards/E2871.htm

E2196

Biofilm formation and quantification (rotating disk reactors)

www.astm.org/Standards/E2196.htm

E2647

Biofilm formation and quantification (drip flow reactors)

www.astm.org/Standards/E2647.htm

E2799

Evaluating disinfectant efficacy (MBEC assay)

www.astm.org/Standards/E2799.htm

Fig. 5

– Biofilms are implicated in numerous problems plaguing industry and society in general.

They can also be employed for good, however, to protect beneficial microorganisms such as

those found on coral reefs and kelp beds.

where film development can have a

positive effect. For example, biofilms

on fish reefs and seaweed beds provide

protection from environmental threats.

Whether the goal is to prevent or

promote biofilm growth, the market

potential for materials that do one or

the other is huge with numerous appli-

cations (Fig. 5). The development path

for suchmaterials, however, is currently

impeded by a lack of standards for mea-

suring a material’s ability to control bio-

film formation and growth. Although a

few test standards associated with

biofilms exist, as noted in Table 2, they

do not apply to the rigorous R&D that

would be required to bring anti-biofilm

materials to market.

SETTING A NEW STANDARD

A few years ago, a standards com-

mittee organized by SIAA set out to ad-

dress the need for an anti-biofilm test

standard. Its two-fold objective was to

better understand the biofilm forma-

tion process as it relates to materials

and gain proficiency with test methods

that can reliably measure the degree of

fouling associated with biofilm growth.

The combination of process

knowledge and evaluation expertise is

essential to the development of new

anti-biofilm and anti-biofouling ma-

terials, as well as any standard that

would apply (Fig. 6). Such knowledge

and know-how is indeed evident in a

key background document describing

a series of investigations undertaken by

Kanematsu et al.

[5-7]

Several concepts

in the emerging standard are based on

this work, although the standard prom-

ises to be more universal and would ap-

ply to any organization in any market.

At the time of this writing, the com-

mittee is engaging in full-scale research

to finalize the first draft of the proposal.

The goal is to produce a standard that

can be used not only by engineers in

industry, but also by testing organiza-

tions and academic researchers.