Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  23 / 50 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 50 Next Page
Page Background

A D V A N C E D

M A T E R I A L S

&

P R O C E S S E S |

A P R I L

2 0 1 7

2 3

Fig. 4 shows a tractor production part

optimized through this approach, with

ubstantial cost reductions and attrac-

tive ROI.

Further, ICME predicts and in-

cludes effects of the manufacturing

process (e.g., residual stress from car-

burizing or shot peening) in the design

stage for optimal, robust components

leadership to have an impact on all four

OEM materials related decisions. Some

possibilities and real examples follow.

Materials research

. Generally, the

OEMmaterials engineering R&D team is

responsible for identifying appropriate

opportunities to introduce new materi-

als and processes to the organization.

The challenge is to identify newly ma-

ture technologies and specific compo-

nents and processes that could impart

business value. Mere generic identifi-

cation of technology trends, e.g., nano-

materials, additive manufacturing (AM),

or lightweighting, is not sufficient for

successful adoption by the organiza-

tion. For example, although AM is near

the required maturity level for business

implementation, the challenge lies in

specific organizational opportunities

where it can be successfully implement-

ed with sufficient value. Even at current

manufacturing cost levels, AM has been

successfully leveraged in low-volume,

high-performance critical aerospace

components that cannot be produced

using traditional manufacturing meth-

ods. Other AM applications include

low-volume production parts made

without investing in tooling costs, pro-

ducing agriculture machinery parts,

rapid prototyping in product develop-

ment, and making tool fixtures.

Another factor to consider before

adopting new materials or processing

technology is the simultaneous maturi-

ty of all associated functions

[1]

. Bottle-

necks for technology adoption many

times are due to functions other than

materials engineering. For example,

adopting nanobainitic steel (a steel

with extraordinary strength and ductili-

ty) requires a designer’s acceptance for

a specific application, a structural ana-

lyst’s acceptance in terms of materials

properties and failure criteria, accep-

tance of materials standards and qual-

ity criteria, the OEM’s ability to form

and handle this high strength material,

and possibly the most difficult aspect of

ensuring a supply chain to scale up the

use of the special material at an accept-

able cost (Fig. 1).

Similarly, adopting adhesives to

replace welded structures requires

changes in the OEM manufacturing line

with guidelines for failure criteria and

analytical procedures. Structural appli-

cations of carbon fiber-reinforced com-

posites include high-end sports cars,

boats, and aerospace components.

Carbon-fiber composites are also

used in agriculture machinery, such

as self-propelled sprayers with higher

boom width. The lightweight structure

results in significant weight reduction,

enabling a 25% increase in sprayer tank

capacity, which enhances productivity.

High customer value justifies the use of

this expensive material.

Product engineering

. Emergence

of integrated computational materials

engineering (ICME) provides opportuni-

ties for the materials engineering func-

tion to have an impact on OEM product

development. ICME is a computational

framework that integrates design, ma-

terials, and manufacturing during prod-

uct development and creates value at

their point of juncture (Fig. 2). Value

creation arises from engineering real-

ization through an accelerated devel-

opment cycle and/or reduced product

cost

[2]

.

ICME has been leveraged for func-

tional design of specific alloy grades

and functional coatings, as well as de-

sign optimization. The approach can be

leveraged at multiple scales including

efficient design of specific components.

Figure 3 shows an integrated ICME

framework, where design, process,

and product verification phases are

coupled to realize an optimal, robust

component

[3]

. In the framework, de-

sign and FEA steps are combined with

the correct tooling and process for the

purpose of optimization, which signifi-

cantly reduces the design-FEA iteration

cycle and enables optimal product de-

sign. Further, cost and performance

are incorporated for a holistic design

to evaluate multiple materials and de-

sign concepts. Instead of the prevalent

heuristic approach, the framework

also provides opportunities for ratio-

nal materials and process selection

for a specific component, resulting in

significant cost and weight reductions

in castings, welded fabrications, and

heat treated components. For example,

Fig. 1 —

Multifunctional maturity is required

to successfully adopt newmaterials and

processes.

Fig. 2 —

ICME value creation at the junction

of design, materials, andmanufacturing

through a computational framework.

Fig. 3 —

Integrated framework for design

optimization including simultaneous materi-

als andmanufacturing considerations

[3]

.