Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  22 / 62 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 62 Next Page
Page Background

A D V A N C E D M A T E R I A L S & P R O C E S S E S | M A R C H 2 0 1 6

2 2

using a test specimen with a short un-

supported gauge length and using a lat-

eral support along the specimen length.

There are several different compression

test methods and associated fixtures

in widespread use that employ differ-

ent methods of load introduction and

anti-buckling. All composite compres-

sion fixtures are required to have ex-

cellent axial alignment and high lateral

stiffness in order to prevent the large

lateral loads that can be generated

during the test and cause specimen

bending. Most compression test meth-

ods require specimen bending to be

monitored and set a limit for maximum

allowable bending during a test.

Shear properties for design data-

bases are generally determined using

a V-notch specimen subjected to shear

loading across the V-notch using either

ASTM D5379 (Iosipescu) or ASTM D7078

test fixtures. Specimen preparation and

testing for V-notch shear tests is com-

plex and there are simpler shear tests

that are suitable for comparative test-

ing, screening, and quality control (QC).

The in-plane shear (IPS) test is a tension

test on a specimen cut from a laminate

panel containing only 0° and 90° fiber

directions so that the fiber directions

are

±

45° to the specimen axis. This

test enables shear modulus and shear

strength to be determined. The inter-

laminar shear strength (ILSS) test is a

widely used QC test. This method sub-

jects a small, simple, rectangular spec-

imen to three-point bending. This con-

figuration results in large shear stresses

along the mid-plane of the specimen,

resulting in shear failure.

Flexure testing is also used to de-

termine a number of composite mate-

rial properties. Compared to other test

methods, flex testing has the advan-

tage of requiring simple rectangular

specimens without tabs or complex

machining.

In addition to tests designed to

determine the bulk properties of com-

posites, a number of tests have been

developed to determine the interlam-

inar properties (e.g., delamination) of

composite laminates. Examples of such

tests include

double cantilever beam

(DCB) - Mode I fracture testing

and

end

notched flexure (ENF) - Mode II fracture

testing,

which enable determination of

fracture toughness parameters.

Fatigue testing of composite ma-

terials is generally performed using

tension-tension cyclic loading of rect-

angular specimens. Typically, a number

of cyclic tests are performed at various

stress amplitudes in order to produce an

S-N curve that plots the stress amplitude

against the number of cycles to failure.

Fatigue testing of composites is time

consuming because the test frequency

must be limited to prevent the speci-

men from overheating. Fatigue loading

cycles, which include compression load-

ing, are not common due to the difficulty

of preventing specimen buckling.

High-rate testing of composite

materials is required to predict their

behavior in the event of a crash. Com-

mon examples of high-rate testing of

composite materials include impact

testing and high-rate tension/com-

pression testing. In a high-rate impact

test, a composite panel or part is sub-

ject to an impact from a drop weight

ASTM D7078 V-notched shear specimen

and test fixture.

Instron’s electromechanical machine is

capable of performing a variety of com-

posite tests over a range of temperatures.

results in a through-thickness tensile

stress in the curved section. On thicker

laminates it may be possible to perform

direct tension tests on cylindrical speci-

mens cut from the laminate.

In-plane composite compression

test methods provide a means of in-

troducing a compressive load into the

specimen and preventing buckling of

the specimen under the compressive

load. Three methods of introducing a

compressive load into a test specimen

include:

1. End loading: The load is introduced

by pushing on the flat end of the

specimen.

2. Shear loading: The load is intro-

duced into the wide faces of the

specimen.

3. Combined loading: A mix of shear

and end loading.

Two approaches are applied to

prevent buckling of test specimens,