Previous Page  14 / 58 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 58 Next Page
Page Background

edfas.org

ELECTRONIC DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS | VOLUME 19 NO. 2

14

Doppler shift when more in-line. Positron spectroscopies

have been developed to examine each of these cases.

POSITRON SOURCES

Table 1 lists a number of radioactive sources used to

create positrons for slow positron beams. Virtually all

source-based beams use commercially available

22

Na

capsules.

22

Na has a long half-life, which means that the

capsule does not need to be replaced more than every

few years, and its high positron fraction helps mitigate

the lower count rate. A fewother details areworth noting.

11

C is often used in medicine because it has such a short

half-life.

58

Co canbemade by irradiating nickel in a reactor,

and it has an acceptable lifetime.

[9]

It has been chosen as

the source for use with the experiments discussed sub-

sequently.

64

Cu is another commonly created test source,

because it can easily be made with access to a nuclear

reactor, and it decays quickly.

A positron is created when a proton decays into a

neutron, a neutrino, and a positron. Because this is a

three-body decay, the positrons are created with an

energy spectrum determined by the decaying atom. All

have a similar shape, as shown in Fig. 4. The endpoint

energy represents the highest-energy positron that can be

created from such a decay, but it is the energies near the

peak intensity that are important. These are the positrons

that will be slowed tomake the bulk of the beam. Another

significant detail from Fig. 4 is the positron fraction. This

represents the number of radioactive decays that will

result in creation of a positron. For atoms such as

22

Na,

which has a positron fraction of 0.91, most decays result

in a positron, but for

64

Cu, less than one-fifth of all decays

generate one. Furthermore, the half-life determines how

frequently the element decays and therefore how often

positrons will be generated.

Source geometry also plays an important role in

generating positrons, and it comes with some strict limi-

tations. The first is the thickness of the source. A thicker

source contains more radioactive material and thus will

generatemore positrons. However, as the source is made

thicker, fewer and fewer positrons are energetic enough to

penetrate through to the source itself to contribute to the

beamcount. The benefit of increasing the thickness of the

sourcediminishes until the absolute limit is reached, when

positrons generated farthest back all annihilate inside the

source itself. Positrons generated froma broad source run

afoul of the Liouville theorem when one attempts to use

electrostatic forces to focus them into a tight beam. The

Liouville theoremsays that phase space is conservedwhen

conservative forces are involved. A tight beamof particles

traveling parallel to one another cannot be created froma

broader beamby using only conservative processes, such

as electrostatic forces. One may focus such a beam into

a smaller region at the cost of it being a parallel beam.

Having a small parallel beam is important, however,

because the detectorsmust be placed far from the source

of the positrons, which necessitates beam transport for a

meter or more.

In the DFPG, the source is designed as a large ring

structure. This maximizes surface area whilemaintaining

a symmetry that allows the monoenergetic positrons to

be focused to a single point. At that point, a nonconserva-

tive process is introduced to reorient the positrons into a

parallel beam.

MODERATION

Themost significant limitation topositronbeam inten-

sity lies in the moderation step. Positrons emerge from a

radioactive source with a spectrumof energies. To obtain

an acceptable resolution, the positron beammust have a

Table 1 Various radioactive sources used for

positron production

Source Endpoint,

MeV Production Half-life Positron

fraction

11

C

960

11

B (

p

,

n

)

20 minutes

0.99

22

Na

540

24

Mg (

d

,

a

)

2.6 years

0.91

58

Co

470

58

Ni (

n

,

p

)

71 days

0.15

64

Cu

650

63

Cu +

n

12.8 hours

0.19

66

Ge

1880

66

Zn (

a

, 2

n

)

275 days

0.86

Fig. 4

Intensity distribution of positrons emitted by

64

Cu.

Source: Ref 10

(continued on page 16)