Previous Page  36 / 58 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 36 / 58 Next Page
Page Background

edfas.org

ELECTRONIC DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS | VOLUME 19 NO. 1

36

into the halls. The cross-company interaction success-

fully enabled networking as well as intriguing debate on

future sample-prep challenges, including stricter required

tolerances, handling of smaller and more complex form

factors, and growth of techniques requiring very thin RST.

ISTFA 2016 NANOPROBING USER GROUP

Moderators: Nicholas Antoniou, Revera, Inc., and Baohua Niu, TSMC

nantoniou@revera.com bhniu@tsmc.com

T

heNanoprobingUser Group, withnearly 100people

in attendance, had a very packed schedule that

included five exceptional speakers covering awide

range of interesting topics. The sessionwas sponsored by

FEI/Thermo Fisher Scientific.

Dr. Sung Park started the discussion with an interest-

ing new technology presentation: infrared photo-induced

force microscopy (IR PiFM). This is an atomic force

microscopy (AFM)-based platform that, coupled with a

wideband-tunablemid-IR laser, can“fingerprint” chemical

species near the AFM resolution limit. PiFM can acquire

both the topography and spectra images concurrently. Dr.

Park showed the breadth of the capabilities of the PiFM

with data on various polymer systems, such as polymer-

polymer blends, polymer interfaces, bio-polymers, and

block copolymers. By enabling imaging at the nanometer

scale with chemical specificity, PiFM provides a powerful

new analytical method for deepening our understanding

of nanomaterials and facilitating technological applica-

tions of such materials.

Dr. Frank Altmann of Fraunhofer IMWS spoke about

the application of nanoprobing and scanning electron

microscopy (SEM)-based current imaging for failure

analysis applications in semiconductor microelectron-

ics. Two electron-beam-based probing techniques were

discussed in great detail, highlighting the capabilities

of each method. One is electron beam induced current

(EBIC), and the other is electron beam absorbed current

(EBAC). For both methods, the primary electron beam of

the SEM acts as a local current source that generates a

resulting current densitywithin the IC structure. The intro-

duced or absorbed current is acquired by a probe needle

placed at a certain IC position that is initially identified in

the SEM image, subsequently amplified, and finally syn-

chronized with the SEM image. EBIC is commonly used to

investigate

pn

junctions of diodes to obtain information

about the position and size of the depletion zone and to

verify dopant process parameters. EBAC, on the other

hand, allows the localization of opens and shorts within

the metal network. Furthermore, a recently developed

approach allows the localization of thin oxide shorts or

weaknesses by EBAC aswell. Both techniques are capable

of electrical characterization of a single transistor and

defect localization. Dr. Altmann then detailed some of the

sample-prep techniques: delayering, cross sectioning, and

focused ion beam (FIB) circuit cut/edit, which are critical

to the success of EBIC and EBAC analysis of ICs.

Mr. Bob Newton of Thermo Fisher Scientific talked

about electron beam induced resistance change (EBIRCH)

best practices and best-known methods (BKMs), based

on his years of experience in the field. He covered key

features of the EBIRCHsystemand current BKMs for defect

localization. He described how to set voltage bias and

beam conditions, given a possible defect depth, and also

introduced a novel workflow to ensure optimum defect

localization while keeping device integrity intact. The

introduced workflow is general in that it can be used on

many types of semiconductor devices and shows a high

success rate on each type.

Dr. Tomáš Hrnčíř of Tescan, Czech Republic, presented

xenon plasma FIBdelayering and nanoprobing on an Intel

14 nm sample. Using a commercially available Intel 14

nm microprocessor unit sample that features the latest

ultra-low-k dielectric materials and physically very thin

layers, Dr. Hrnčíř discussed theadvantageof xenonplasma

FIB delayering as a key enabling technique to prepare

a well-characterized sample surface for much-needed

nanoprobing of each critical layer. Dr. Hrnčíř presented

a configuration of a xenon plasma FIB with specialized

gas-injection system chemistries and an SEM with high

resolution at very low beam energy (≤500 eV to minimize

beam damage to sensitive devices) as the platform for

preparing samples for nanoprobing. Freshly delayered

surfaces can be used immediately for nanoprobing by

utilizing the Kleindiek Probe Shuttle installed inside the

xenon plasma FIB-SEM chamber. This approach allows

nanoprobing on perfectly clean and flat surfaces. He

showed atomic forcemicroscopymeasurement data that