Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  20 / 54 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20 / 54 Next Page
Page Background

• Successive layers follow the same principle and build

up the part layer-by-layer.

Table 2 provides a comparison of capabilities, benefits,

and limitations of various AM technologies used for pro-

ducing titanium parts

[3-6]

.

Titanium AM applications

Extensive exploration regarding use of AM titanium

parts in aerospace and medical applications is underway.

Other potential AM applications include the chemical and

defense industries. While powder bed fusion technologies

are suitable for smaller, complex geometries with hollow

unsupported passages/structures, directed energy deposi-

tion is better suited for larger parts with coarser features

requiring higher deposition rates.

Use of finer powder grains combined with smaller

laser/electron beam size achieves a superior surface fin-

ish on the as-built parts from the powder bed fusion

technologies compared to directed energy deposition

technologies. However, the majority of AM parts require

finish machining for most applications. Beyond building

new parts, the ability of directed energy technologies to

add metal onto existing parts makes it possible to apply

protective surface coatings, remanufacture and repair

damaged parts, and reconfigure or add features to exist-

ing parts.

Complex geometry

A small beam size and small layer thickness, along

with support of the powder bed, allow powder bed fu-

sion technologies (such as EBM, DMLS, or SLS) to

ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES •

FEBRUARY 2014

20

TABLE 2 — COMPARISON OF VARIOUS ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES

Item/Process

Laser-based PBF

Electron beam-based

Laser-based directed energy

(DMLS)

PBF (EBM)

deposition (DMD)

Build envelope

Limited

Limited

Large and flexible

Beam size

Small, 0.1-0.5 mm

Small, 0.2-1 mm

Large, can vary from 2-4 mm

Layer thickness

Small, 50-100

m

m

Small, 100

m

m

Large, 500-1000

m

m

Build rate

Low, cc/h

Low, 55-80 cc/h

High, 16-320 cc/h

Surface finish

Very good, Ra 9/12

m

m,

Good, Ra 25/35

m

m

Coarse, Ra 20-50

m

m,

Rz 35/40

m

m

Rz 150-300

m

m, depends on

beam size.

Residual stress

High

Minimal

High

Heat treatment

Stress relief required,

Stress relief not required,

Stress relief required,

HIP’ing preferred.

HIP’ing may or may not be

HIP’ing preferred.

performed.

Chemistry

ELI grade possible, negligible

ELI grade possible, loss of

ELI grade possible, negligible

loss of elements.

Al needs to be compensated loss of elements.

for in powder chemistry.

Build capability

Complex geometry possible

Complex geometry possible Relatively simple geometry

with very high resolution.

with good resolution.

with less resolution. Limited

Capable of building hollow

Capable of building hollow

capability for hollow

channels.

channels.

channels.

Repair/Remanufacture

Possible only in limited

Not possible

Possible; capable of adding

applications (requires

metal on 3D surfaces under

horizontal plane to begin

5+1-axis configuration, making

remanufacturing).

repair solutions attractive.

Feature/metal addition on Not possible

Not possible

Possible; depending on

existing parts

dimensions, ID cladding is

also possible.

Multi-material build or

Not possible

Not possible

Possible

hard coating

Fig. 3 —

Hydraulic manifold built using EBM

technology. The part was built at Oak Ridge

National Laboratory (ORNL). Courtesy of ORNL.

Fig. 4 —

Medical

implant application.

Courtesy of Jim Sears.