Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  14 / 58 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 58 Next Page
Page Background edfas.org

ELECTRONIC DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS | VOLUME 18 NO. 2

14

visible after passivation removal. Even though the defects

were clearly visible, their cause, extent, and implications

were unknown. Extensive study over several years was

required to understand the physics of stress-induced

voiding. Because of quantummechanical tunneling, lines

with stress voiding may operate even at low frequencies.

However, the voids become wider very slowly with time

and eventually cause low-frequency failure. Heating and

cooling can alter the failure signature and make it harder

to identify. Removal of the passivation or other encap-

sulating layers will change stress cracks, usually making

them worse. The analyst then must answer the question

of whether the identified defects were present before

deprocessing or are a result of deprocessing.

Today, it is understood that different CTEs ofmetal and

surrounding oxide produce stress that induces voiding.

Stress voids are a fact that must be expected. Barrier

metals have been added to provide a redundant path

around a void in a long metal strip. A void in a long metal

strip no longer causes an electrical failure. Stress void

failures are not that easily eliminated. Vias, or connec-

tions between layers of conductors, are locations where a

stress void can produce an electrical open. For aluminum

systems, tungsten plugs can create stress and introduce

open possibilities.

[6]

For copper systems, vias again offer

unique possibilities of failure.

[7]

Redundant vias may be

used to avoid IC failure despite possible voiding. However,

redundant vias may not always be possible.

In today’s ICs,many newdiagnostic techniquesmay be

required to electrically define a defect site. If the defect is

in themetallization, stress cracks become a consideration.

There will not be one dramatic finding that proves stress

voiding as the cause. If the defect is a stress void, it will not

be the only one; other voidswill exist in different or similar

places. Metal purity may be an issue. The analyst will be

challenged tofindandanswer goodquestions that hone in

on the cause. When peripheral symptoms are verified and

other mechanisms have been eliminated, stress voiding

will top the list. It will be up to the analyst or responsible

colleagues to finalize the conclusion. The procedure may

not be that different from1980, whichmay be why failure

analysis is still so much fun.

REFERENCES

1. J. Klema, R. Pyle, and E. Domangue: “Reliability Implications of

Nitrogen Contamination during Deposition of Sputtered Aluminum/

Silicon Metal Film,”

Int. Reliab. Phys. Symp. (IRPS),

1984, pp. 1-5.

2. J. Yue, W. Funston, andH. Taylor: “Stress-Induced Voids in Aluminum

Interconnects during Processing,”

Int. Reliab. Phys. Symp. (IRPS),

1985, pp. 126-37.

3. W. Filter: “Stress Voiding in IC Interconnects—Rules of Evidence for

Failure Analysts (Part I),”

Electron. Dev. Fail. Anal.,

Nov. 1999,

1

(4),

pp. 21-23.

4. D.G. Robinson: “Quantifying the Impact of Materials Degradation on

Storage Reliability: Stress Voiding of Integrated Circuits,” PMC2000-

212,

Eighth ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics

and Structural Reliability, 2000.

5. T. Turner and B. Root: “The Influence of Stress on Aluminum

Conductor Life,”

Int. Reliab. Phys. Symp. (IRPS),

1985, pp. 142-47.

6. S. Domae, H. Masuda, K. Taatiwa, Y. Kato, and M. Fujimoto: “Stress-

Induced Voiding in Stacked Tungsten Via Structures,”

Int. Reliab.

Phys. Symp. (IRPS),

1998, pp. 318-22.

7. H.W. Yao, P. Justison, and J. Poppe: “Stress-Induced Voiding Risk

Factor and Stress Migration Model for Cu Interconnect Reliability,”

Int. Reliab. Phys. Symp. (IRPS),

2013, pp. 2C.5.1- 5.8.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

David Burgess

is a failure analyst and reliability engineer. He developed techniques and taught

in those areas at Fairchild Semiconductor and Hewlett-Packard. He is the founder of Accelerated

Analysis, a manufacturer and distributor of specialty failure analysis tools. David is the co-author of

Wafer Failure Analysis for Yield Enhancement

. A graduate of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and San

Jose State University, he is a member of EDFAS and has served on various ISTFA committees. David is

a Senior Life Member of IEEE and was General Chairman of the 1983 International Reliability Physics

Symposium (IRPS).

Advertise in

Electronic Device Failure Analysis

magazine!

For information about advertising in

Electronic Device Failure Analysis

, contact Kelly Thomas, CEM.CMP,

National Account Manager; tel: 440.338.1733; fax: 614.948.3090;

e-mail:

kelly.thomas@asminternational.org

.

Current rate card may be viewed online at

asminternational.org/mediakit.