Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  23 / 62 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 62 Next Page
Page Background

A

s today’s electronics systems continue

to shrink and become more complex

and pervasive, failures can cause costly

downtime, product delays and recalls, and de-

bilitating reputational damage. Finding and fix-

ing failures before they do damage is important,

but becomes increasingly challenging when

devices are built using ever more complex de-

signs. The solution is to employ a comprehen-

sive, multidisciplinary approach to electronic

system failure analysis. In addition, many fail-

ures can be avoided altogether by thorough

testing, coupled with the latest focused ion

beam (FIB) circuit edit techniques. These ad-

vanced methods quickly and inexpensively

debug and validate design fixes or explore de-

sign optimization opportunities in integrated

circuits (ICs) without having to commit to

costly and time-consuming full mask spins.

System complexity continues

Systems are becoming more complex at all

levels—board, die, IC, and package. Today’s de-

vices can contain billions of transistors, and in-

tegrate a wide variety of previously discrete

components and independent systems. With

the arrival of FinFET, metal gate, low-k dielec-

tric, and other advanced process nodes, devices

are getting even smaller. Packaging complexity

is also growing, with options including system-

in-package (SiP), multi-chip modules (MCM),

SiSub, stacked die, through-silicon via (TSV),

and Cu wire. Devices also increasingly feature

multi-layer metal stacks and are produced in

flip chip and other advanced chip scale form

factors. Meanwhile, the materials, coatings, and

molding compounds associated with advanced

packages and boards are also growing more

complex. In the power arena, many devices are

moving to silicon carbide (SiC), gallium nitride

(GaN), and other wide bandgap materials that

create additional challenges related to design

and characterization, process monitoring, and

reliability.

To make failure analysis even more difficult,

many failures occur only intermittently. System

challenges vary widely by industry and applica-

tion, with each functional element in a design

often requiring specialized domain knowledge

to understand a failure’s root causes and mech-

anisms. Networking and automotive systems

offer prime examples of the depth of today’s

failure analysis challenges. A networking sys-

tem can span multiple boards containing thou-

sands of components, including complex ICs

and SoCs that may also contain many types of

RF, power supply, high-speed digital, and stor-

age media.

Today’s automobiles are similarly complex,

containing as many as 100 electronic control

units (ECUs) or more, for systems ranging from

backup cameras to lane-changing warning sys-

tems. Further, tomorrow’s assisted driving and

sensor-guided autopilot systems are expected

to include a dozen ultrasonic detectors and

multiple cameras and radar sensors. Failures

can occur anywhere in a complex chain of

standalone and multiple interrelated systems.

Meanwhile, counterfeit components may also

have entered the automotive supply chain, in-

troducing additional risks and accentuating the

need for screening and analysis in addition to

various types of verification and authentication

tests against reliability specifications.

Failure analysis: The first line of defense

The ideal failure analysis approach must

span both electrical and physical analysis to op-

timize root cause identification and determine

the associated failure mechanism and how to

prevent future failures. The focus must be on

the entire system, including the electronics,

materials, and failure mechanisms occurring at

the IC transistor level (Fig. 1).

Effective failure analysis also requires highly

experienced and well trained technicians with

expertise that extends from the component to

the system level, along with a comprehensive

set of lab equipment. Failure analysis service

providers must be able to perform parallel pro-

ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES •

AUGUST 2014

23

Advanced Designs Pose Challenges for

Electronic System Failure Analysis

Finding and

fixing

electronics

failures is

more

challenging

than ever as

devices are

being built

with

increasingly

advanced

materials and

processes.

Taqi Mohiuddin

EAG Inc.

Sunnyvale, Calif.

Fig. 1 —

Multi-level failure analysis should extend across the full continuum of possible

root causes and failure mechanisms.

Pass/fail

Electrical

parameters

Isolated

electrical

data

IC/discrete

component

analysis

System (black box)

System characterization

Board level

Component level

Limited information,

corrective action not

possible

Helps localize failure and

determine next steps for

deeper investigation

Localize failure to PCB or

component level

Root cause analysis