Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  28 / 82 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 82 Next Page
Page Background

A D V A N C E D M A T E R I A L S & P R O C E S S E S | M A Y / J U N E 2 0 1 7

2 8

A

rcheological investigations into

the origins of glassmaking have

been aided in recent years by a

flood of new information obtained from

scanning electron microscopes and

x-ray spectrometers. These indispens-

able tools have helped researchers re-

solve conflicts and ambiguities that

had persisted for decades by revealing

new details in the microstructure and

chemical composition of ancient glass

items, some dating back to 4000 B.C.

[1]

In much the same way, advanced im-

aging and spectrographic technology

is proving to be a valuable asset in the

production of cell phone cover glass,

which is as critical to the world’s future

as ancient glass artifacts are to the past.

COVER STORY

Cell phone cover glass plays an

important role in the lives of more than

six billion people. It also supports the

booming smartphone industry and

contributes in many ways to today’s

economy. Each year, specialty glass-

makers produce and ship more than

one billion cell phone covers, pushing

the limits of materials science, man-

ufacturing methods, and inspection

techniques as they strive to make their

products stronger, lighter, sleeker, and

more resilient—without raising prices.

Cover glass, like most cell phone

components, is a highly engineered

VISUALIZING CELL PHONE

COVER GLASS USING

ADVANCED TESTING

TECHNIQUES

Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy

open new windows into glassmaking processes.

John Konopka,* Thermo Fisher Scientific, Madison, Wis.

*Member of ASM International

product manufactured to exacting

specifications. It consists of a high pu-

rity glass substrate topped with mul-

tiple surface enhancing layers. The

substrates are chemically strengthened

by placing them in a bath of molten salt,

causing large ions from the solution to

switch places with smaller ions on the

glass surface. Once the glass cools and

the lattice structure contracts, the larg-

er ions create a state of compression

that has a strengthening effect on the

host material. Several layers of proper-

ty altering materials are then deposited

on the treated substrates, making the

final product more resistant to scratch-

es, reflections, and other hazards in-

cluding microbial growth.

To determine if the various man-

ufacturing steps went according to

plan—or to investigate suspected ab-

normalities—glassmakers

frequently

employ a combination of scanning elec-

tron microscopy (SEM) and energy dis-

persive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS). When

used together, these analytical tools

make it possible to visualize materials

down to the nanometer level and evalu-

ate chemical composition towithin tens

of nanometers. Such precision is essen-

tial for optimizing today’s glassmaking

processes and for identifying inclusions

and other defects that may hold clues

in cases where cover glass fails.

E-BEAMS AND X-RAYS

Scanning electron microscopy, as

its name implies, works by scanning

an electron beam over a target area.

As the beam sweeps over the test sam-

ple, scattered electrons are collected

at equidistant points on an imaginary

grid and the resulting signal is convert-

ed to a high-resolution image. Incident

electrons from the beam can also excite

atoms along the beam path, causing

them to emit x-rays that contain atom-

ic information. X-ray emission energies

correlate to atomic structure and are

unique to each element. Scanning elec-

tron microscopes equipped to measure

this dispersive energy can thus reveal

the chemical composition of test sam-

ples as well.

Solid-state detectors for ener-

gy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy have

been available for nearly 50 years. The

earliest versions, which appeared in the

late 1960s, are based on a silicon-lithi-

um sensing mechanism that converts

photon energy, through quantum col-

lisions, to free electron charge. Si(Li)

detectors excel at high-energy wave-

lengths, but they require liquid nitro-

gen cooling to suppress leakage current

that would otherwise interfere with

measurements.

Roughly 20 years after the debut

of the first solid-state x-ray detectors,