Previous Page  6 / 58 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 58 Next Page
Page Background

edfas.org

ELECTRONIC DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS | VOLUME 18 NO. 3

6

Most capacitors use two sets of plates, withone connected

directly toeach termination. For high-voltageparts suchas

this one, manufacturers often add a third set of “floating”

plates in the center of the part that are not directly con-

nected to anything. This effectively creates two capacitors

in series. The advantage of this arrangement is a little extra

assurance that if a void or a particle of debriswere present

inside the capacitor dielectric, causinga short between the

terminationplates and thefloatingplates, therewould still

be another set of plates preventing the part from being

completely shorted. Furthermore, to create a short on a

capacitor built this way, it would be necessary for the left

set of termination plates to bridgewith the floating plates

in the center and the right-hand set of termination plates

to also be shorted with that

exact

same floating plate.

Statistically speaking, the likelihood of this scenario is

low. For this reason, the contention that this capacitor

was shorted internally because of voiding-related plate

bridging was viewed with strong skepticism.

Acousticmicroscopy is often used by capacitor manu-

facturers to screen out parts that have been compromised

by voids or debris in the dielectric material between

plates. Although air is technically an insulator, voids in

the capacitor dielectric can facilitate several failuremodes

that otherwise would not be possible. Migration of the

platemetal canoccur, as already seenon theouter surface,

and humidity can condense under the high-temperature

conditions inwhich this part will be operating. Most of the

time, ultrasonic inspection is relatively straightforward

and forgiving in the sense that even when parameters

are not perfectly optimized, it is still possible to spot any

notable defects. Among the many imaging modes avail-

able on a modern acoustic microscope, two time-tested

methods will find nearly any defect in a typical capacitor:

bulk scan and loss-of-back-echo (LOBE) scan. Because

high frequencies of ultrasound cannot propagate through

air, even incredibly small pockets of air are very effective at

reflecting an ultrasonic signal sent into the capacitor. The

LOBE technique uses this concept to advantage by depict-

ing the shadows where the ultrasonic signal was blocked

when the microscope captures a backside image of the

part. In this way, features such as diagonal cracks, which

scatter the sound without returning it to the transducer,

can still be spotted. So, the name of the imaging mode

describes exactly how it works: Any echo that is lost by the

time it reaches the back surface of the part tells the opera-

tor something. The LOBE scan in Fig. 3(a) shows a fewdark

areas, which can be checked against forthcoming scans.

The other main inspection method used to search for

defects in cap dielectric is bulk scan, where the image

is generated by only those reflections originating from

inside the part, purposely excluding the front and back

surface reflections. In this imaging mode, bright reflec-

tions represent air gaps inside the bulk of the dielectric.

Figures 3(b) and (c) show two bulk scans of the shorted

capacitor. When creating these images, the transducer

is typically focused halfway between the front and back

surface, which, in this case, was measured to occur at

a time of flight (TOF) equal to 13.9 µs. However, when

this accepted convention is used, the resultant image

shows no voids at the locations indicated by the LOBE

scan. After repeating the scan with a higher and lower

TOF, the operator discovered that different sets of voids

were revealed, depending on the transducer focus. The

particular combination of materials used in this dielectric

material is restricting the acoustic depth of field. This is

not normally the case, and it gives a plausible reasonwhy

acoustic inspection at the time of manufacture may have

missed a set of voids that did not appear when the acous-

tic microscope was configured according to customary

settings for bulk scan inspection. The image in Fig. 3(c),

which was created with a TOF equal to 10.2 µs, reveals

Fig. 3

(a) LOBE acoustic image. (b) Bulk scan acoustic image with TOF at 13.9 µs. (c) Bulk scan acoustic image with TOF at

10.2 µs

(b)

(a)

(c)