Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  S-5 / 62 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page S-5 / 62 Next Page
Page Background edfas.org

ELECTRONIC DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS | VOLUME 18 NO. 1

area so that it is greater than the submillimeter fieldof view.

For novel FIBs, there were two specific references. The

first was part of Jason Sanabia’s Raith nanoFIB presenta-

tion, where he discussed possible uses for liquid metal

ion source alloy-source-based beams. Raith now has alloy

sources available, and Jason showed various applications

that used gold, silicon, and AuGe cluster beams for nano-

pore and plasmonic device machining, respectively.

The second area of focus was the presentation by

Edward Principe (Tescan USA) on the use of xenon plasma

cusp ion sources for TEM prep and other applications.

Edward discussed the implementation of a rocking stage

into the dual-beam plasma FIB to help mitigate ion

beam channeling effects that cause curtaining during

cross sectioning and uneven milling due to varying grain

orientation. The basic idea is to normalize the material-

removal rate by varying the ion beam incident angle on

the substrate. Edward also reviewed the addition of new

detector hardware to enable large-area 3-D tomography

and time-of-flight SIMS in the Tescan dual-beamplatform.

The last area discussed in the Tescan presentationwas the

use of xenon beams for delayering. According to Edward,

the xenon beam is particularly good for this application,

due to its low current density in combinationwith Tescan’s

endpoint-detection system.

TEM sample preparation was a very strong theme in

this year’s User Group meeting, with three of the five pre-

sentations covering TEM prep and much of the following

discussion focusing on the subject. Jamil Clarke of Hitachi

High Technologies America discussed techniques and

tooling to achieve ultrathin, low-damage lamellae. The

two primary advancements are the inclusion of a seven-

axis stage and the incorporation of an argon or xenon ion

beam, to eliminate curtaining and to remove amorphasized

materials, respectively. The seven-axis stage allows the

user to reorient the sample during lamella preparation

to improve machining uniformity and eliminate curtain-

ing effects. The inclusion of an argon ion gun into the

dual-beam platform (making it a tribeam) enables in situ

removal of the damaged region of the lamella caused by

the higher-energy Ga

+

ion beam.

Matt Bray of FEI Company presented a review of the

three-step process for creating TEM lamellae down to

7 nm. The three steps are “chunking,” the process of

undercutting the sample substrate; lift-out, the process of

moving the chunk from the sample to the TEM grid; and

thinning, removing all the material down to the region of

interest. Although these techniques are not new per se,

the presentation emphasized that all three steps are now

highly automated, which enables TEM prep access to a

less-experienced user base and improves overall efficiency

and prep quality.

The final area of TEMprepwas part of EdwardPrincipe’s

presentation on the Tescan xenon plasma dual-beamplat-

form. Edwarddiscussed the benefits of using a high-current

xenon beam to improve lamella prep throughput time. He

also discussed buildingmultiple windows into the lamella

to expand the analysis region of interest to larger areas.

At the conclusion of the five presentations, the attend-

ees’ discussion centered on the merits of using different

ion beam species and different beam energies for TEM

sample prep and other large-areamilling techniques. Much

discussion ensued on using xenon beams and damage

mitigation when using low-energy gallium or argon ions.

The audience was also interested in hearing about other

alternative ion sources, such as helium and neon gas-field

ion sources (GFIS) and cold beams. It was noted that there

was a talk on cesium cold beams in the 2014 User Group

and one on neon GFIS in the 2013 User Group but nothing

in 2015. Looking to next year, we will pick up the theme of

alternative beams and applications.

Q

uick and reliable sample preparation, from

electron-transparent transmissionelectronmicros-

copy (TEM) lamellae preparation to 3-D package

decapsulation, defines the success of any root-cause

ISTFA 2015 SAMPLE-PREP/3-D PACKAGE-PREP USER GROUP

Moderators: Jake Klein, Texas Instruments, and Rose M. Ring, Globalfoundries, Inc.

Klein_Jake@ti.com rosalinda.ring@globalfoundries.com

failure analysis (FA) project or request. Sample preparation

has been a key topic at ISTFA for decades. The Sample-

PreparationUser Groupmeeting has beenwidely attended,

and this year was no different. More than 60 attendees

S - 5