Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  56 / 82 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 56 / 82 Next Page
Page Background

A D V A N C E D M A T E R I A L S & P R O C E S S E S | N O V E M B E R / D E C E M B E R 2 0 1 6

5 6

FEATURE

6

A

erospace Material Specification (AMS) standards

and the Nadcap accreditation process play key

roles in ensuring that manufacturers performing

heat treating and other special processes adhere to con-

sistent, high-quality standards for producing aerospace

products. While preparing for a Nadcap audit can seem

daunting, a series of articles has been developed that dis-

cusses some of the recommended resources for prepar-

ing for and executing a successful audit. The first part of

this series (June 2016,

HTPro

) looked at preparing for and

scheduling an audit. The second part (September 2016,

HTPro

) addressed the internal audit process, nonconfor-

mances, and completing the internal audit. This final arti-

cle looks at the official audit process, auditor interactions,

and completing the official audit.

EXECUTINGA SUCCESSFUL OFFICIAL AUDIT

After performing an internal audit and submitting the

necessary documentation, the official audit is the next step

in the Nadcap accreditation process. The official audit is an

independent, objective activity designed to verify that you

are operating under a specified state of control

[1]

. Having

control over your processes and equipment—essentially

every aspect involved inmanufacturing aerospace compo-

nents—places you in the best position to consistently meet

and adhere to industry quality standards for all aerospace

products.

Close control of your processes is important as cer-

tain processes, such as heat treatment and brazing, are

considered special processes (i.e., processes where it is not

possible to completely verify that the final product meets

the specified requirements). Therefore, these processes

must be validated in advance to ensure products are free

of defects and meet the aerospace industry’s high quality

standards. The only way to guarantee quality results is to

guarantee the process and demonstrate control through a

Nadcap audit.

In addition to preparing for the audit process and

performing an internal audit, a few best practices are rec-

ommended for executing a successful audit; these include

verifying the desired scope of accreditation, scheduling

key personnel, and informing the auditor in advance of any

schedule considerations.

Verifying the scope of accreditation:

When starting the

official audit, one of the first things you typically do with

the auditor is verify that the scope of accreditation sub-

mitted when scheduling the audit has not changed. The

standards and specifications you selected to be audited

against are what the auditor will go over in detail during

the audit process. It is also important to note that you can-

not remove or add any accreditations once the auditor has

finished verifying the scope.

Scheduling personnel:

According to some compa-

nies that have undergone a Nadcap audit, it is import-

ant to have personnel who performed the internal audit

available during the official audit process. Key personnel

typically include those most knowledgeable about day-to-

day processes, as well as those who regularly operate the

equipment. It is also important to inform all personnel of

the audit process and confirm that they understand their

role in making the audit successful as the auditor may

choose to talk with one of them during the official audit.

Informing the auditor of schedule considerations:

Scheduling is crucial during the official audit. In most

OBTAINING NADCAP ACCREDITATION: HELPFUL GUIDELINES

FOR PASSING YOUR AUDIT, PART III

Learn how to simplify the process of obtaining Nadcap accreditation for your heat treating

facility by paying heed to some of the challenges others have experienced.

Nathan Durham,

Ipsen USA, Cherry Valley, Ill.

During the Process segment of the Nadcap audit, the

auditor will spend a significant portion of time reviewing

specification checklists and both historical and live jobs.

Images courtesy of Ipsen.