Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  21 / 66 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 66 Next Page
Page Background

as shear bands, kink bands result in large

but limited local deformation, do not

cause microstructural damage, and may

even provide a beneficial mechanical re-

sponse. Kink band formation allows for

very large deformations at a constant

stress, with neither a load drop nor an

increase in engineering stress that would

occur during homogenous deforma-

tion

[7]

. Therefore, kink bands may prove

beneficial for the design of energy ab-

sorbing structures where large strain de-

formation at a constant reaction force is

a highly desirable mechanical response.

Summary

Cu-Nb nanolaminates can be pro-

duced in bulk form using the industry

scalable ARB process. These materials

display high strengths (>1 GPa) and show

a strong propensity for kink band forma-

tion during layer parallel compression.

The combination of microstructural

stability, high strength, and unusual de-

formation behavior make metallic nano-

laminates intriguing candidate materials

for structural applications.

~AM&P

For more information:

Thomas Nizolek

is a Ph.D. student at University of Califor-

nia, Santa Barbara,

tnizolek@engr.ucsb

.

edu, www.materials.ucsb.edu

.

This article has been adapted from a full

length feature in

Metallography, Microstruc-

ture, and Analysis

3.6 (2014): 470-476,

DOI 10.1007/s13632-014-0172-2. © Spring-

er Science+Business Media New York and

ASM International 2014.

Acknowledgment

T.N. was supported by the Department of

Defense through the National Defense Sci-

ence & Engineering Graduate Fellowship

(NDSEG) Program. J.T.A., T.N., I.J.B, and

T.M.P. wish to acknowledge support by the

UC Lab Fees Research Program,

Award #238091.

References

1. N. Mara and I. Beyerlein, Review: Effect

of Bimetal Interface Structure on the

Mechanical Behavior of Cu-Nb fcc-bcc

Nanolayered Composites,

J. Mater. Sci.

,

Vol 49(19), p 6497-6516, 2014.

2. M. Demkowicz, et al., Interface Structure

and Radiation Damage Resistance in Cu-

Nb Multilayer Nanocomposites.

Phys. Rev.

Lett.

, Vol 100(13), p 136102-136104, 2008.

3. M. Knezevic, et al., Texture Evolution in

Two-Phase Zr/Nb Lamellar Composites

During Accumulative Roll Bonding,

Int.

J. Plast.,

Vol 57, p 16-28, 2014.

4. K. Yasuna, et al., Bulk Metallic Multilayers

Produced by Repeated Press-Rolling and

Their Perpendicular Magnetoresistance,

J. Appl. Phys.,

Vol 82(5), p 2435-2438, 1997.

5. L. Ghalandari and M. Moshksar, High-

Strength and High-Conductive Cu/Ag Mul-

tilayer Produced by ARB,

J. Alloy. Compd.,

Vol 506(1), p 172-178, 2010.

6. I. Beyerlein, et al., Interface-Driven Mi-

crostructure Development and Ultra High

Strength of Bulk Nanostructured Cu-Nb

Multilayers Fabricated by Severe Plastic

Deformation

, J. Mater. Res.,

Vol 28(13),

p 1799-1822, 2013.

7. T. Nizolek, et al., Enhanced Plasticity

via Kinking in Cubic Metallic Nanolam-

inates,

Adv. Engr. Mater.,

DOI: 10.1002/

adem.20400324, 2014.

A D V A N C E D

M A T E R I A L S

&

P R O C E S S E S | F E B R U A R Y

2 0 1 5

2 1