Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  44 / 78 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 44 / 78 Next Page
Page Background

ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES •

NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2014

44

HTPRO

10

inately Fe

2

B with only minor traces of

FeB present at the surface.

To design a process capable of creating a

specific boride layer depth comprising sin-

gle-phase Fe

2

B, each steel grade requires

different processing parameters in terms

of cycle time, temperature, and boron po-

tential for each stage of the process. For

instance, processing parameters used for

deep case boriding 1018 plain carbon steel

are quite different than the parameters for

A2 tool steel to produce a 0.015 in. deep

single-phase Fe

2

B layer.

Applications and performance

Deep case boriding of parts provides

greater depth of the ultrahigh hardness

boride layer, which extends the wear life

of parts. For example, a ground-engaging

tool manufactured with a carbide wear

insert is now being borided with im-

proved wear life. Two sets of the tool

were provided to a manufacturer for field

testing to compare service life-to-failure

of tools treated with a conventional 0.004

in. boride layer depth and a deep case

borided 0.010 in. layer depth. Figure 7

shows the microstructures of each tool

set. After multiple field trials, the manu-

facturer of these tools elected to have the

deep boriding process specified for its

tools, even at a higher cost than the con-

ventional boriding process or tools made

with a carbide insert. According to the

manufacturer, the 0.010 in. boride depth

versus the 0.004 in. boride depth is 75 to

100% more durable under varying soil

conditions. The relative wear properties

of the parts with deeper boride treatment

are superior in a cost-benefit analysis.

An oilfield drilling-tool company is spec-

ifying the deep boriding process for its

tools, which are exposed to high pressure

flow of abrasive particles. Deep boriding

improved tool performance to the point of

lasting for the entire well-drilling process

compared with previous parts that wore

out and failed during drilling, requiring

costly downtime to replace the tools.

Bluewater provided two sets each of a

conventionally borided and deep case

borided high-wear part to an agricultural

machinery manufacturer to compare wear

performance in abrasive crop and soil

conditions. Conventional boriding more

than doubled the expected life of these

parts over heat treating alone. At the point

where the conventional boride layer wore

off, the deep case borided parts still had

quite a bit of boride layer depth present

and did not showmuch signs of wear. Fig-

ure 8 shows the wear surface of the two

components where the shallow borided

part shows significant material loss while

the deep borided component shows very

little material loss due to wear.

Bluewater Thermal Solutions’ custom

designed deep-boriding processes were

successful for each project. The ability to

customize the process for different steel

grades and application requirements can

make boriding a more popular choice to

treat parts exposed to harsh wear envi-

ronments. Deep case boriding enables

producing wear layer depths comparable

to competitive processes such as carbur-

izing, nitriding, thermal spray coatings,

and hardfacing. In addition to having a

comparable wear-resistant depth, boride

layers are much harder than carburized

and nitrided cases, and have similar or

higher hardness than many flame spray

and hardface coatings, while maintaining

better dimensional tolerances than the

coating processes, which add material.

Deep case boriding could be the solution

to wear problems in many applications

where parts are exposed to extreme wear

in harsh operating environments.

HTPRO

References

1. H-J. Hunger and G. Trute, Boronizing to

Produce Wear-Resistant Surface Layers,

Heat Treatment of Metals

, 1994, 2, p 31–39

2. G. Kartal, et al., The Growth of Single

Fe

2

B Phase on Low Carbon Steel Via Phase

Homogenization in Electrochemical Borid-

ing (PHEB),

Surface and Coatings Technol-

ogy

, Vol 206, 7, Dec. 2011, p 2005–2011.

For more information:

Craig Zimmer-

mann is Director-Technical, Bluewater

Thermal Solutions, 414.573.2832 (mobile),

czimmerman@bluewaterthermal.com

;

Nick Bugliarello is general manager of

Chicago Plants 1 and 3, 708.410.8000

(plant),

nbugliarello@bluethermal.com

,

bluewaterthermal.com

.

Fig. 7 —

AISI 4140 alloy steel ground-engaging tools conventionally borided to a depth of

0.004 in. (left) and deep case borided to a depth of 0.010 in. (right). Boride layers in both are

single-phase Fe

2

B.

Fig. 8 —

AISI 1045 plain carbon steel high-

wear agricultural machinery parts borided to

a depth of 0.005 in. (left) and deep case

borided to a depth of 0.014 in. (right). After

service on the same machine for the same

amount of time, the conventional borided

part shows significant material loss due to

wear, while the deep case borided part

shows virtually no wear.