Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  26 / 70 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 70 Next Page
Page Background

tifies some materials-related issues and introduces an

emerging technology that may affect the future of Ti

2

AlNb.

Materials Development:

In the past 30 years, composi-

tion design has played a significant role in improving the

mechanical properties of Ti

2

AlNb alloys and current ma-

terials offer a balanced set of properties. However, even

with all their attractive properties, Ti

2

AlNb alloys still pres-

ent significant challenges.

Mechanical properties such as high-cycle fatigue

(HCF), low-cycle fatigue (LCF), crack growth, fracture

toughness, and creep behavior of Ti

2

AlNb alloys have been

studied extensively. Table 2 provides an overview of the

pros and cons of Ti

2

AlNb alloys vs. other alloys.

One additional consideration regarding Ti

2

AlNb alloys

is the apparent environmental sensitivity at temperatures

above roughly 550°C. Ward, et al.

[19]

, showed that a Ti-

25Al-10Nb-3V-1Mo alloy exhibits significant, but not

total, ductility loss during tensile testing in air at tempera-

tures of 550° and 650°C. This ductility loss is most severe

when testing at lower strain rates such as 2

x

10

-4

. Testing at

higher strain rates such as 2

x

10

-1

minimized ductility loss,

which is consistent with an environmental effect. It sug-

gests that at high temperatures, oxygen and nitrogen can

dissolve interstitially or form brittle phases in the subsur-

face zone

[20, 21]

, causing early failure of Ti

2

AlNb. This point

was further confirmed by testing in vacuum where the

alloy showed excellent ductility with no significant strain

rate sensitivity. Examples of Ward’s data for tests run at

650°C are provided in Table 3.

While these ductility reductions are not catastrophic,

they are significant enough to require consideration during

design of any component used under these operating con-

ditions. Environmental protective coatings might mitigate

this effect, but the component design still must be robust

enough to function even if the coating is breached during

service. Such a practice is commonly used in cases where

similar environmental sensitivity is encountered.

New Technology:

Additive manufacturing (AM) has

gained increasing attention since 2010 and its advantages

are widely recognized

[22]

. The ability to directly produce in-

tricate shapes is remarkable. Complex shapes have been

made from spherical powder using both laser and electron

beam AM methods

[23]

. These parts are essentially in-situ

castings with high solidification rates. Therefore, the ten-

sile properties—particularly yield strength—of these parts

are expected to be somewhere between those of forging

and larger investment casting.

Avio S.p.A (Turin, Italy) demonstrated the ability to

make γ-TiAl low-pressure turbine blades (Fig. 6) using

electron beam melting (EBM) technology. Theoretically,

ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES •

MAY 2014

26

TABLE 2 — PROPERTIES OF Ti

2

AlNb VS. Ti ALLOYS AND Ni-BASE ALLOYS

[2]

Properties

Near-

a

Ti

Ti

2

AlNb

g

-TiAl

Ni-base

Density

+

+/-

++

-

HT spec. Young’s modulus

+/-

+

++

+

Coefficient of thermal expansion

+/-

+

-

-

RT ductility

++

++

-

+

Formability

+

+

-

+

Specific HT tensile strength

-

+

+/-

-

Creep resistance

-

+

+

++

Specific RT-HCF strength

+

+

-

+/-

RT crack growth

+

+/-

-

+

RT crack growth threshold

+

+/-

+/-

+/-

RT fracture toughness

+

+/-

-

++

Oxidation resistance

-

+

+

++

HT embrittlement

-

+/-

+

Embrittlement & RT fatigue

-

+/-

+

+

HT: High temperature, RT: Room temperature, HCF: High cycle fatigue

TABLE 3 — EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENT AND STRAIN RATE ON TENSILE DUCTILITY

OF A Ti-25Al-10Nb-3V-1Mo ALLOY TESTED AT 650°C

Environment

Strain rate

Fracture strain,

e

f

Elongation (%)

R of A (%)

Vacuum

2

x

10

-3

1.24

24.5

70.9

Air

2

x

10

-1

0.94

29.1

60.9

Air

2

x

10

-3

0.18

14.8

16.2