Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  36 / 58 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 36 / 58 Next Page
Page Background

3 6

A D V A N C E D M A T E R I A L S & P R O C E S S E S | J A N U A R Y 2 0 1 5

carbon structural steels such as

ASTM A-36. In addition, weld

testing on plate thicknesses from

0.20 up to 0.75 in. of higher strength

marine (EH-36) and structural

(ASTM A709-Gr 50) steels exhibits

good strength, ductility, and fracture

toughness (Fig. 5). Hobart Metal Cor

6 welding wire was used during

testing, along with an argon-10%

CO

2

shielding gas mixture.

Processmodeling

Any new welding process

requires significant testing on a

variety of materials, thicknesses,

and joint designs. However,

HiDep involves different

operating characteristics than

conventional arc welding.

Consequently, significant work

has been done to develop

numerical models that will

provide the capability to apply

HiDep beyond application areas

that have been tested to date.

The main difference between

HiDep and traditional arc

welding is induction heating.

Numerical models were

developed by Gatekey

Engineering, Canal Winchester,

Ohio, to provide information

about the electromagnetic

field, as well as heat generation

and flow, in HiDep welds.

Fully coupled electromagnetic

and thermal models of butt

joint welds using HiDep have

been tested and verified with

laboratory data. A complete

model for butt welding of steel

was also completed (Fig. 6).

In addition, models of T-fillet

weld joint configurations

are in progress. Testing and

verification of T-fillet HiDep

on selected thicknesses and

configurations for steel is

expected to be complete

by mid-2015. These models

include induction coils, weld

gaps, and standoff distances of

the induction coil from the weld

and the pieces being welded.

The library of numerical models

will eventually be expanded

with the goal to include models

for several different common

weld joints.

Welding equipment

Developers of the HiDep

process took advantage of

several features in the Miller

Auto-Axcess power supply,

which is the core of the

equipment. Over several years,

commercial portable induction

robotic systems for weld

distortion removal and metal

forming were developed and

deployed by the HiDep team.

These portable systems use

the ToccoTron 25 kW and Miller

ProHeat 35 kW induction power

supplies—equipment widely

specified within the welding

industry for both welding and

weld pre-heating. Consequently,

many industrial operations

already stock supplies and have

trained maintenance personnel

available for the primary HiDep

equipment. The HiDep controller

uses a standard Parker ACR9000

system for power, cooling, and

other controls.

Work to develop complete

systems, including options for

adaptive fill, seam tracking, and

coil height stand-off control

is ongoing. The welding and

induction power supplies and

other equipment can be fully

integrated into a new system

with robotic or mechanized

welding operation, or can be

retrofitted into an existing

system. Commercial systems

for butt seam welding of plate

will be available in late 2015,

and for other joint designs as

the process is developed and

tested. The induction coil is an

EnergynTech system integrated

with cooling and power.

Ruggedized coil configurations

are being tested for butt seam

welding.

Looking forward

Work is ongoing to develop

other induction coil designs for

curved path welding and for

other types of weld joint designs

including fillet welds. A new

Fig. 6 —

Modeling thermal output for 5/8 in. (top) and 3/8 in. (bottom) steel.