Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  19 / 82 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 19 / 82 Next Page
Page Background

A D V A N C E D

M A T E R I A L S

&

P R O C E S S E S |

M A Y / J U N E

2 0 1 7

1 9

cavity using a robotic system and fol-

lowed by an automated water quench-

ing operation. The casting is then ready

for post-processing operations includ-

ingT5andT6 tempers. Temper selection

depends on component requirements

and economic considerations. Machin-

ing operations for near-net-shape HPDC

parts are typically performed after heat

treatment and require the casting to be

dimensionally stable

[2]

. Figure 5 shows

production process steps.

Hardness is a key quality accep-

tance criterion for engine blocks be-

cause it relates to the cylinder’s tri-

bological characteristics. Therefore,

in the case of a DiASil cylinder block

(Fig. 1b), the targeted hardness of

!

73

HRB is used as an indicator of heat

treatment effectiveness. Heat treament

is the most time consuming production

step and therefore the most cost-inten-

sive operation (Fig. 5). Thus, there is a

need to shorten heat treatment time

without compromising hardness, re-

ducing overall manufacturing time and

reducing costs. This represents an op-

portunity for cost savings.

OPTIMIZING PROCESS

PARAMETERS

The overall production cycle (i.e.,

from casting through heat treatment)

rather than individual operations must

be considered to effectively maximize

hardness and reduce processing time

[1]

.

Process variables that are not typical-

ly optimized or controlled in industrial

practice have measurable individual

effects, potentially offering additional

benefits on their superimposed effect

[1]

.

Using T5 instead of T6 temper.

The

short T6 temper consisting of solution-

izing, quenching, and aging is used for

engine block applications to improve

mechanical properties and casting ho-

mogeneity. The duration of the solution

treatment in existing heat treatment

standards is often longer than that re-

quired to achieve the desired level of

microstructure refinement. For the

castings in this study, proper optimi-

zation of the T6 solution treatment re-

quired only 30 minutes at 510°C, which

resulted in similar or higher hardness

than was achieved by solutionizing at

490°C for 4 hours

[3]

. Hardness of up to

85 HRB was achieved for T6 tempered

conditions (Fig. 6), with an overall pro-

cess duration of approximately 480

minutes (Fig. 5). A more refined micro-

structure achieved during HPDC pro-

cessing yields higher hardness of the

D

-Al metal matrix.

Castings can experience blistering

during the solutionizing treatment. Blis-

tering is a casting defect caused by an

increase in gas pressure in subsurface

porosity during solutionzing. Increased

pressure results in deformation of the

thin metal layer surrounding the pore

close to the casting surface. A vacuum

process is used to reduce gas content in

the die cavity during the HPDC opera-

tion to avoid blistering during T6 solu-

tionizing. The resulting gas level in the

finished casting is approximately 5 cm

3

/

100 g. Application of vacuum in the

range of approximately 1 to 30 mbar

measured in the die cavity eliminates

Fig. 4 —

CanmetMaterials 1200-ton high pressure die casting system used for R&D studies:

(1) clamp area with die; (2) furnace with automatedmelt transfer system; and (3) robot for parts

extraction. Courtesy of CanmetMaterials.

Fig. 5 —

Duration (minutes) of manufacturing operations for a motorcycle cylinder block.