Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  36 / 62 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 36 / 62 Next Page
Page Background

iTSSe

TSS

A D V A N C E D M A T E R I A L S & P R O C E S S E S | F E B R U A R Y 2 0 1 6

3 6

iTSSe

TSS

6

FEATURE ARTICLE

THERMAL SPRAY ALUMINUM COATINGS

FOR SPLASH ZONE STRUCTURES—PART II

Recent advances in thermal spray techniques enable thermal spray aluminum coatings to reliably

protect offshore structures in splash zones. Part I of this article appeared in the November/December

2015 issue of iTSSe.

Deepashri D. Nage,

L&T Hydrocarbon Engineering Ltd., Mumbai, India

O

ffshore structures are exposed to various corrosion

zones depending on sea level as datum. Both sub-

merged steel surfaces and steel immersed in mud are

typically not coated, instead relying solely on cathodic protec-

tion due to slow predicted corrosion rates. Splash zones in the

-3 to +6 m range of Mean Sea Level (MSL) encounter the most

severe degradation due to continuous contact with highly aer-

ated sea water splashes. This zone requires special protective

care by exotic painting techniques because cathodic protec-

tion is ineffective.

To shield splash zone structures from corrosion and

other environmental degradation, coating is the best pro-

tective measure. Coatings for this zone have evolved from

Monel sheath to high build epoxy and other organic for-

mulations. Recent advances in thermal spray techniques

have found thermal spray aluminum coatings (TSAC) to be

an effective protection method in splash zones. Although

thermal spray of just a few microns thick offers corrosion

resistance and functional properties in precision jobs, there

is concern about whether or not it is effective when applied

to very large structures. This article focuses on challenges as

well as successful implementation of TSAC by arc spray on

splash zone structures. Here we look at an oil and gas plat-

form recently installed off the east coast of India.

Figures 4 and 5 illustrate bend tests (ASTM D522) and

adhesion tests (ASTM D4541), respectively, performed for

every shift, each operator, and adhesion on the companion

coupon. Figure 6 shows TSAC application on an actual job

and the components of an offshore jacket coated with TSAC.

Figure 7 shows the TSAC job completed and installed in In-

dian waters.

CHALLENGES FACED IN IMPLEMENTING TSAC

Coating of piping, equipment, and structural compo-

nents is generally the final step in the sequence of fabri-

cating equipment—or an entire plant—after all assembly/

fabrication work is complete. Because TSA coating is a hot

process with certain limitations, individual pieces should be

coated at the component level with the connecting joints

coated upon assembly. Although the companies and ther-

mal spray applicators who are able to handle this magni-

tude of coating work are limited, a proper qualification and

readiness was ensured within this particular project’s time-

line and specifications.

Aluminum metallic coatings offer several advantages,

including excellent corrosion protection of steel due to the

cathodic protection phenomenon, consumables with no

shelf life expiration, zero volatile organic compounds, and

Fig. 4 —

From left to right, bend test method (ASTM D522) and photograph of test performed on TSAC sample.