Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  2 / 50 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 2 / 50 Next Page
Page Background

9639 Kinsman Road

Materials Park, OH 44073

Tel: 440.338.5151 • Fax: 440.338.4634

Frances Richards

,

Senior Editor

frances.richards@asminternational.org

Julie Kalista

,

Editor

julie.kalista@asminternational.org

Barbara L. Brody

,

Art Director

Joanne Miller

,

Production Manager;

Editor, ASM News

joanne.miller@asminternational.org

Press Release Editor

magazines@asminternational.org

EDITORIAL COMMITTEE

Mario Epler,

Chair,

Carpenter Technology Corp.

Yu-Ping Yang,

Vice Chair,

Edison Welding Institute

Ellen Cerreta,

Past Chair,

Los Alamos National Lab

William Lenling,

Board Liaison

Laura Addessio,

PCC Structurals Inc.

Arvind Agarwal,

Florida International University

Gerald Bruck,

Siemens Westinghouse Power Corp.

Steven Claves,

Alcoa Inc.

Adam Farrow,

Los Alamos National Lab

Nia Harrison,

Ford Motor Co.

Alan Luo,

The Ohio State University

Roger Narayan,

UNC-NCSU

Scott Olig,

Vision Point Systems

Nina Pang,

Boston University

Somuri Prasad,

Sandia National Lab

Fei Ren,

Oak Ridge National Lab

Michael Rigsbee,

North Carolina State University

Kumar Sridharan,

University of Wisconsin

Jaimie Tiley,

U.S. Air Force Research Lab

Cong Wang,

Saint-Gobain High Performance

Materials

ASM BOARD OF TRUSTEES

C. Ravi Ravindran,

President

Sunniva R. Collins,

Vice President

Robert J. Fulton,

Treasurer

Gernant E. Maurer,

Immediate Past President

Jeffrey A. Hawk

William J. Lenling

Linda S. Schadler

Iver Anderson

Mitchell Dorfman

James C. Foley

Jacqueline M. Earle

John R. Keough

Zi-Kui Liu

Thomas S. Passek,

Secretary and Managing

Director

STUDENT BOARD MEMBERS

Virginia K. Judge,Anthony Lombardi, Myrissa N. Maxfield

Individual readers of Advanced Materials & Processes may,

without charge, make single copies of pages therefrom for per-

sonal or archival use, or may freely make such copies in such

numbers as are deemed useful for educational or research pur-

poses and are not for sale or resale.Permission is granted to cite

or quote from articles herein, provided customary acknowl-

edgment of the authors and source is made.

materials wi tness

ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES •

JULY 2014

2

Standing on the edge of a revolution

A

lthough some people may feel that additive

manufacturing—aka 3D printing—is overly

hyped these days, it’s clear that many others believe

we are truly on the edge of another Industrial Revo-

lution. The ability to design and print complex parts

layer-by-layer is being compared to the transforma-

tive power of the cotton gin and steam engine. It’s

creating a lot of buzz and significant research is

being poured into figuring out the best way to take

advantage of this amazing technology.

In fact, I just returned from a week at the 25th

AeroMat Conference and Exposition in Orlando, Fla.,

which featured a theme of “the latest word in aero-

space materials.” Several presentations discussed ad-

ditive manufacturing, including an excellent and well attended plenary session starring

William Frazier, FASM, of NAVAIR, and David Abbot of GE Aviation. Frazier’s talk, “The

Transformative Potential of Additive Manufacturing,”called the quickly developing tech-

nology “disruptive, transformative, and enabling,” and said it will change the very way

we do business. He spoke in detail about potential benefits, using the Navy’s challenges

and goals as concrete examples. While discussing the country’s aging weapons systems

and aircraft, he bluntly stated that it is simply too expensive and time consuming to

make replacement parts for old systems using traditional subtractive techniques.

In contrast, the Navy’s bold vision is to one day be able to print parts on demand,

where and when they are needed. He also affirmed that we have a long way to go to-

ward reaching that goal. He stressed that using additive methods, rather than subtrac-

tive processes, enables shorter lead times, mass customization, reduced part counts,

more complex shapes, less material waste, and the ability to reverse engineer parts as

needed. Frazier mentioned that although the Navy is implementing additive processes

for blade and vane tip repairs, the biggest roadblock is the need for faster, low cost part

qualification and certification. Other challenges include the need for validated models

and in situ nondestructive inspection as the additive process is taking place, as well as

a way to account for machine-to-machine variability.

David Abbott then spoke about additive manufacturing efforts at GE Aviation and

interestingly points out that design engineers will need to change the way they think

about designing parts from the outset—that these new additive processes will revolu-

tionize the way we

think

in addition to how parts are physically made. He also said that

by 2020, GE plans to additively produce 40,000 fuel nozzles per year. Abbott stressed the

need for companies to learn from each other—he is a part of EWI’s additive manufac-

turing consortium and is also involved with America Makes, the National Additive Man-

ufacturing Innovation Institute.

On a celebratory note, ASM and ATI partnered to put on a VIP reception featuring

Lieutenant Colonel Leo Gray, one of the 27 remaining Tuskegee Airmen fromWorldWar

II. Gray shared some very interesting, funny, and personal stories from his time flying

P-51 Mustangs over Germany, during nearly four years of active duty. The event was

enjoyed by all and serves as a stark reminder of why aerospace innovation remains such

an important endeavor.

frances.richards@asminternational.org

Tuskegee Airman Lt. Col. Leo

Gray (left) with Frances Richards

and Donald Baldwin (of GE) at

AeroMat 25.