Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  42 / 62 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 42 / 62 Next Page
Page Background

FEATURE

A D V A N C E D M A T E R I A L S & P R O C E S S E S | M A R C H 2 0 1 6

4 2

8

USING VACUUM FURNACES TO PROCESS 3D-PRINTED PARTS

Vacuum heat treating is a crucial step in the additive manufacturing

process cycle to meet required part quality specifications.

Robert Hill, FASM,*

Solar Atmospheres of Western PA, Hermitage, Pa.

A

dditive manufacturing (AM), or 3D printing, is a revo-

lutionary technology that involves converting a digi-

tal model into a net- or near-net shape metallic part

by building up layers of powder or wrought feedstock. Many

believe AM will change the world of manufacturing, while

others believe it will never replace machining, otherwise

known as subtractive manufacturing. The reality probably

lies somewhere between the skepticism and hype.

OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

The possibilities and benefits of AM are exciting. A huge

advantage of the process is that it uses only the material

needed to make the part. In addition, unlike subtractive

manufacturing, AM has no design constraints, enabling free-

domof design for functionality. AM also significantly reduces

the time from part design to market: Part manufacturing of-

ten begins within one hour of final design.

The variousmethods of additivemanufacturing are tru-

ly revolutionary technologies, which present many challeng-

es. One of the main hurdles is the high cost of equipment,

where a single printer with ancillary equipment can cost

roughly $1 million. Printer feedstock materials are also ex-

pensive. For example, the price of metallic powders ranges

from $300/lb for alloy steel to $1200/lb for titanium alloys.

The AM field also lacks industry-wide standards. AM

metallurgy consists of multiple recast layers (versus tradi-

tional metallurgy of one homogenous melt of material),

which can result in many inconsistencies. Issues that need

to be resolved include how individual layers of deposited

material are qualified, quantified, and inspected. Acceptable

levels of porosity and density must also be defined. In addi-

tion, certain processes produce parts that exhibit different

mechanical properties longitudinally with the deposit and

transversely across the deposit.

Therefore, the big challenge facing the AM industry is

to identify new, effective quality assurance techniques. In

most cases, certification and validation initiatives for AM

products are being driven by primary contractors such

as General Electric Aviation and Lockheed Martin. Many

aerospace OEMs have spent millions of dollars on the

research and development of new opportunities,

especially for the jet engine. With the design freedom

that AM provides, aeronautical engineers can now

model to the fit, form, and function of a particular part

with minimal constraints. As more AM components

*Member of ASM International

Fig. 1 —

Test turbine engine blades produced by the EBAM

process.

continue to evolve from the lab into production, the

benefits of greater strength, less weight, and significant fuel

savings often outweigh the cost. (Fig. 1).

ADDITIVE PROCESSES

Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS)

is a process in

which metal powder is injected into a high-power

(400-1000 W) focused laser beam operating under tightly

controlled at-mospheric conditions. The laser beam melts

the surface of the target material, generating a small

molten pool of base material. Powder is delivered and

absorbed into the pool, forming a deposit. Typically, the

DMLS process is carried out in an inert chamber to control

oxidation of the metallic pool. Materials processed via this

method include titanium, Inco-nel, and cobalt-chromium

alloys. The low deposition rate of DMLS enables production

of fine details (Fig. 2).

Electron beam additive manufacturing (EBAM)

directs a

high-power electron beam to selectively fuse wire on a plate