Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  6 / 50 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 50 Next Page
Page Background

6

A D V A N C E D M A T E R I A L S & P R O C E S S E S | A P R I L 2 0 1 7

FEEDBACK

2016 COMMODITIES REVIEW: A MIXED BAG

I

t was a mixed year for commod-

ities in 2016, according to analysts at

Roskill Information Services, London.

Major trends included debt reduction

by large public mining companies, ad-

justment to China’s slowing economy,

and market reactions to the growing

public sentiment against “business as

usual”—including the European refer-

endum vote and the U.S. presidential

election. Prices for a number of com-

modities were at several-year lows as

2016 began. But by mid-year, increases

were seen in aluminum, crude steel,

iron ore, and across a range of minor

metals and industrial minerals, say

analysts.

Moving into 2017, stability appears

to be the key aim of the major miners.

For steel alloys in particular, the out-

look for 2017 is positive, with vanadi-

um feedstock availability set to be tight

amid growing buzz around vanadium

redox batteries (VRBs). The year started

with vanadium prices at a considerable

low, with ferrovanadium prices having

dropped from over $22/kg at the start

of 2015 to below $14/kg by the end of

the year. In 2016, prices slowly recov-

ered, reaching over $20/kg by Novem-

ber. Most market participants expect

BETHLEHEM STEEL POSTMORTEM

I read the article on the decline of

the U.S. steel industry with great interest

[“Metallurgy Lane,” November/Decem-

ber 2016]. In early 1973, I interviewed

at Homer Research Laboratory after

returning from Army Reserve training in

the Ordnance Corps at Aberdeen Proving

Ground. My master’s thesis advisor at MIT,

Professor John Elliott, helpedme set this

up. The lab was a really busy place and

the cafeteria had a great view of the valley

and big mill below. Nothing came of my

visit, but I did find out that new hires were

getting about a month of vacation, since

the union had negotiated that for the

hourly men.

Fast forward to the mid-1980s when

I was working for Air Products outside of

Allentown. I needed to get some ten-

sile bond testing (ASTM C633) done for

developmental thermal spray coatings

and Homer Lab had the test machines to

do it. I was shocked when I got there. The

formerly bustling cafeteria and labs were

nearly deserted. Our metallographer at

Air Products had worked at Homer Lab

and he believed there were two main

reasons for Bethlehem Steel’s fall:

Licensing technology to the Japa-

nese that they exploited better than

Bethlehem did.

Allowing non-inventors in the chain

of command to add their own names

to an engineer’s patent application.

There was a company limit on the

total number of names per patent, so

if too many of the brass climbed on

board, the real inventor was bumped.

This somehow reduced innovation.

I wonder if other ASMmembers

could confirm this or weigh in on Bethle-

hem’s demise with more information and

opinions.

Robert Miller

We welcome all comments

and suggestions. Send letters to

frances.richards@asminternational.org

.

prices to continue to improve during

2017, with vanadium demand from the

steel sector forecast to grow at a steady

rate and the availability of feedstock ex-

pected to remain tight.

Regarding chromium, it has been

a difficult time for chromite and ferro-

chrome producers, say analysts. De-

mand for stainless steel recovered after

the global economic downturn, and so

did prices during 2010-2012. After this

period, falling production costs coupled

with oversupply and relatively sluggish

demand caused prices to stagnate and

then fall. By Q1 2016, prices were at six-

year lows. However, in the second half

of 2016, a dramatic recovery occurred

and by Q3, chrome ore prices had re-

covered to their highest levels since the

global downturn. In 2017, it is forecast

that ferrochrome prices will remain

strong in Q1 and possibly Q2.

The molybdenum market showed

a strong recovery in 2016, with U.S.

ferromolybdenum prices increasing

from a low of $6.14/lb in January to a

peak of $9.39/lb in June. However, in

the second half of 2016, poor demand

from downstream industries led to U.S.

ferromolybdenum prices tailing off, av-

eraging $9.04/lb in Q3 and forecast to

average $8.20/lb in Q4 2016. The strong

recovery in pricing has been led by bet-

ter than anticipated stainless steel pro-

duction in China, with the international

Stainless Steel Forum reporting a 4.1%

year-on-year increase in global output

and a 7.9% increase in Chinese output

in the first half of 2016. The recovery

in crude oil prices also supported in-

creased production and exploratory

drilling in North America, which con-

tributed to marginally increased de-

mand for molybdenum-bearing steels.

For more information, visit roskill.com.

Crystal bar vanadium showing different

textures and surface oxidation; 3N5-pure

cube for comparison. Courtesy of wikipe-

dia.org/Alchemist-hp.

MARKET SPOTLIGHT